2016 • Kia
Niro
Kia Niro 1.6 GDI (141 Hp) 2016Overall Score61.5/100
2016 Kia Niro vs 2016 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.6 CDTI (105 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Opel Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia NiroSpecificationOpel Combo
KiaMakeOpel
NiroModelCombo
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Kia NiroSpecificationOpel Combo
—0–100 km/h13,4 s
0 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1591 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
147 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia NiroSpecificationOpel Combo
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
3,9 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Kia NiroSpecificationOpel Combo
4355 mmLength4390 mm
1800 mmWidth1831 mm
1535 mmHeight1845-2100 mm
2700 mmWheelbase2755 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Kia Niro and 2016 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…