DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Opel Combo vs 2004 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeCitroen
ComboModelC3
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
164 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1364 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
90 HPPower68 HP
125 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank45 lt
8 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4322 mmLength3850 mm
1684 mmWidth1667 mm
1801 mmHeight1529 mm
1235 KgWeight1022 Kg
2716 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Opel Combo and 2004 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…