DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Citroen C3 vs 2004 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeOpel
C3ModelCombo
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
165 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1398 ccEngine displacement1364 cc
68 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank52 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption8 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3850 mmLength4322 mm
1667 mmWidth1684 mm
1529 mmHeight1801 mm
1022 KgWeight1235 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2716 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Citroen C3 and 2004 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…