2016 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.4 CNG (120 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
2016 Opel Combo vs 2016 Ford Figo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Ford
Figo
Ford Figo 1.5 Ti-VCT (112 Hp) 2016Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Opel Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationFord Figo
OpelMakeFord
ComboModelFigo
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationFord Figo
12,3 s0–100 km/h—
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
120 HPPower112 HP
206 NmTorque136 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationFord Figo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationFord Figo
4390 mmLength3995 mm
1831 mmWidth1695 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1525 mm
2755 mmWheelbase2491 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Opel Combo and 2016 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…