DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Opel Combo vs 2011 Chery Sweet (QQ) Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeChery
ComboModelSweet (QQ)
2011Model year2011
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
161 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1051 cc
95 HPPower53 HP
127 NmTorque83 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size155/65 R13; 175/60 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

4390 mmLength3550 mm
1831 mmWidth1508 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1491 mm
—Weight850 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Opel Combo and 2011 Chery Sweet (QQ) approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…