DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2011 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeOpel
Sweet (QQ)ModelCombo
2011Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
140 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
53 HPPower95 HP
83 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3550 mmLength4390 mm
1508 mmWidth1831 mm
1491 mmHeight1845-2100 mm
850 KgWeight—
—Wheelbase2755 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2011 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…