DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Opel Combo vs 1997 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
ComboModelScenic
1997Model year1997
Pick-upBody typeMinivan, MPV
2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,7 s
0 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1389 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
82 HPPower98 HP
113 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4230 mmLength4134 mm
1686 mmWidth1719 mm
1805 mmHeight1675 mm
—Weight1290 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Opel Combo and 1997 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…