DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Renault Scenic vs 1997 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeOpel
ScenicModelCombo
1997Model year1997
Minivan, MPVBody typePick-up
5Seats2
5Doors3

Performance

12,7 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1389 cc
98 HPPower82 HP
200 NmTorque113 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4134 mmLength4230 mm
1719 mmWidth1686 mm
1675 mmHeight1805 mm
1290 KgWeight—
2580 mmWheelbase2480 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Renault Scenic and 1997 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…