DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Opel Combo vs 2010 Suzuki Swift Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Swift

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeSuzuki
ComboModelSwift
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats3+1
5Doors3

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
152 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
75 HPPower94 HP
170 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank42 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R15; 185/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4322 mmLength3850 mm
1684 mmWidth1695 mm
1801 mmHeight1510 mm
1278 KgWeight1005 Kg
2716 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Opel Combo and 2010 Suzuki Swift approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Swift leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…