DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Ford KA vs 2010 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford KA

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KASpecificationOpel Combo
FordMakeOpel
KAModelCombo
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Ford KASpecificationOpel Combo
13,1 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
161 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
145 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KASpecificationOpel Combo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
35 ltFuel tank52 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KASpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KASpecificationOpel Combo
3620 mmLength4322 mm
1894 mmWidth1684 mm
1506 mmHeight1801 mm
1055 KgWeight1278 Kg
2300 mmWheelbase2716 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Ford KA and 2010 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford KA leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…