DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Opel Combo vs 2010 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 2
OpelMakeMazda
ComboModel2
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 2
17,0 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
152 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1349 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
170 NmTorque121 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 2
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank43 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 2
4322 mmLength3900 mm
1684 mmWidth1695 mm
1801 mmHeight1545 mm
1278 KgWeight955 Kg
2716 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Opel Combo and 2010 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…