DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Opel Cascada vs 2013 Skoda Octavia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeSkoda
CascadaModelOctavia
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
235 km/hTop speed228 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
200 HPPower184 HP
280 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6 DSG
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4659 mm
1839 mmWidth1814 mm
1443 mmHeight1460 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1463 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2686 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Opel Cascada and 2013 Skoda Octavia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…