DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Opel Cascada vs 2013 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
CascadaModelMegane
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
4Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
235 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower190 HP
280 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/40 R18 92 Y
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4299 mm
1839 mmWidth1785 mm
1443 mmHeight1423 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1319 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Opel Cascada and 2013 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…