DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Cascada vs 2016 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
CascadaModelScenic
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
4Seats5/7
2Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
217 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1600 cc
170 HPPower160 HP
260 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank53 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 EDC
—Tyre size195/55 R20 95H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4634 mm
1839 mmWidth1866 mm
1443 mmHeight1660 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1644/1660 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2804 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Cascada and 2016 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…