DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Scenic vs 2016 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeOpel
ScenicModelCascada
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeCabriolet
5/7Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
200 km/hTop speed217 km/h
1600 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
160 HPPower170 HP
380 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank56 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 EDCGears6
195/55 R20 95HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4634 mmLength4696 mm
1866 mmWidth1839 mm
1660 mmHeight1443 mm
1644/1660 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2804 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Scenic and 2016 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…