DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Opel Cascada vs 2015 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeKia
CascadaModelOptima
2015Model year2015
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
217 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1685 cc
170 HPPower141 HP
260 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4855 mm
1839 mmWidth1860 mm
1443 mmHeight1465 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1515 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Opel Cascada and 2015 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…