DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Kia Optima vs 2015 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeOpel
OptimaModelCascada
2015Model year2015
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
203 km/hTop speed217 km/h
1685 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
141 HPPower170 HP
340 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank56 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4855 mmLength4696 mm
1860 mmWidth1839 mm
1465 mmHeight1443 mm
1515 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Kia Optima and 2015 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…