DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Opel Cascada vs 2017 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Compass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeJeep
CascadaModelCompass
2017Model year2017
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h9,80 s
207 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1362 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
200 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption7,80 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,20 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption6,20 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/55 R18 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4394 mm
1839 mmWidth1819 mm
1443 mmHeight1635 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1430 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2636 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Opel Cascada and 2017 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Compass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…