DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jeep Compass vs 2017 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Compass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeOpel
CompassModelCascada
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

9,80 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
195 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1362 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
230 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
7,80 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
5,20 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
6,20 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R18 VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4394 mmLength4696 mm
1819 mmWidth1839 mm
1635 mmHeight1443 mm
1430 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2636 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jeep Compass and 2017 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Compass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…