DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Cascada vs 2016 Hyundai Verna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeHyundai
CascadaModelVerna
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1362 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
120 HPPower100 HP
200 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size185/65 R15; 195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4440 mm
1839 mmWidth1729 mm
1443 mmHeight1475 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight—
2695 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Cascada and 2016 Hyundai Verna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…