DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Hyundai Verna vs 2016 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HyundaiMakeOpel
VernaModelCascada
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1362 cc
100 HPPower120 HP
132 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption8,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
185/65 R15; 195/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength4696 mm
1729 mmWidth1839 mm
1475 mmHeight1443 mm
—Weight1701-1816 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Hyundai Verna and 2016 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…