2016 • Opel
Cascada
Opel Cascada 1.4 (120 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
2016 Opel Cascada vs 2016 Ford Figo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Ford
Figo
Ford Figo 1.5 Ti-VCT (112 Hp) 2016Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Opel Cascada
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CascadaSpecificationFord Figo
OpelMakeFord
CascadaModelFigo
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Opel CascadaSpecificationFord Figo
11,9 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1362 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
120 HPPower112 HP
200 NmTorque136 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CascadaSpecificationFord Figo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank42 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel CascadaSpecificationFord Figo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel CascadaSpecificationFord Figo
4696 mmLength3995 mm
1839 mmWidth1695 mm
1443 mmHeight1525 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight—
2695 mmWheelbase2491 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Opel Cascada and 2016 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…