DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Opel Cascada vs 2013 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeVolvo
CascadaModelV40
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1362 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
200 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4369 mm
1839 mmWidth1783 mm
1443 mmHeight1420 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1463 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Opel Cascada and 2013 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…