DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Honda CR-Z vs 2013 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeOpel
CR-ZModelCascada
2013Model year2013
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1362 cc
114 HPPower120 HP
145 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank56 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4078 mmLength4696 mm
2013 mmWidth1839 mm
1395 mmHeight1443 mm
1147 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2435 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Honda CR-Z and 2013 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…