DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Campo vs 2000 Jeep Wrangler Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.5–50.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeJeep
CampoModelWrangler
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

18,3 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
140 km/hTop speed144 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2464 cc
100 HPPower121 HP
226 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank57 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,2 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4980 mmLength3886 mm
1690 mmWidth1693 mm
1710 mmHeight1767 mm
—Weight1435 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2373 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Campo and 2000 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…