2000 • Opel
Campo
Opel Campo 2.5 DTI (100 Hp) 2000Overall Score49.5/100
2000 Opel Campo vs 2000 Jeep Wrangler Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 2.5 i (118 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.5/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
49.5–50.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CampoSpecificationJeep Wrangler
OpelMakeJeep
CampoModelWrangler
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors2
Performance
Opel CampoSpecificationJeep Wrangler
18,3 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
140 km/hTop speed142 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2464 cc
100 HPPower118 HP
226 NmTorque198 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CampoSpecificationJeep Wrangler
DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Opel CampoSpecificationJeep Wrangler
4980 mmLength3883 mm
1690 mmWidth1740 mm
1710 mmHeight1748 mm
—Weight1510 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2373 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Campo and 2000 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…