DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Opel Astra vs 1997 Kia Retona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeKia
AstraModelRetona
1997Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
164 km/hTop speed120 km/h
1700 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
68 HPPower87 HP
132 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/70 R13 82T; 175/65 R14 82TTyre size215/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4051 mmLength4000 mm
1696 mmWidth1745 mm
1410 mmHeight1835 mm
1050/1070 KgWeight1505 Kg
2517 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Opel Astra and 1997 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…