DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Kia Retona vs 1997 Opel Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeOpel
RetonaModelAstra
1997Model year1997
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

20,5 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
120 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1700 cc
87 HPPower68 HP
200 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank52 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size175/70 R13 82T; 175/65 R14 82T
YesABS—

Dimensions

4000 mmLength4051 mm
1745 mmWidth1696 mm
1835 mmHeight1410 mm
1505 KgWeight1050/1070 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2517 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Kia Retona and 1997 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…