2004 • Opel
Astra
Opel Astra 1.7 CDTI (100 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
2004 Opel Astra vs 2004 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 1.6 i 16V 4WD (97 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Opel Astra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel AstraSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
OpelMakeChevrolet
AstraModelTracker
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Opel AstraSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
12,3 s0–100 km/h—
181 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
100 HPPower97 HP
240 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel AstraSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank56 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption14 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel AstraSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel AstraSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4249 mmLength3650 mm
1753 mmWidth1630 mm
1467 mmHeight1650 mm
1265 KgWeight1235 Kg
2614 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Opel Astra and 2004 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…