DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2004 Opel Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeOpel
TrackerModelAstra
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,3 s
150 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
97 HPPower100 HP
133 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank52 lt
14 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3650 mmLength4249 mm
1630 mmWidth1753 mm
1650 mmHeight1467 mm
1235 KgWeight1265 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2614 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Tracker and 2004 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…