1983 • Fiat
Ritmo
Fiat Ritmo 2.0 (130 Hp) 1983Overall Score55.5/100
1983 Fiat Ritmo vs 1981 Opel Ascona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1981 • Opel
Ascona
Opel Ascona 2.0 E (110 Hp) 1981Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Opel Ascona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat RitmoSpecificationOpel Ascona
FiatMakeOpel
RitmoModelAscona
1983Model year1981
CoupeBody typeSedan
—Seats5
3Doors2/4
Performance
Fiat RitmoSpecificationOpel Ascona
—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement1979 cc
130 HPPower110 HP
0 NmTorque159 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat RitmoSpecificationOpel Ascona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size185/70 R13
Dimensions
Fiat RitmoSpecificationOpel Ascona
—Length4321 mm
—Width1670 mm
—Height1380 mm
—Weight980 Kg
—Wheelbase2518 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1983 Fiat Ritmo and 1981 Opel Ascona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Ascona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…