DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Opel Antara vs 2012 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMitsubishi
AntaraModelASX
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
186 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement2268 cc
167 HPPower147 HP
230 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank63 lt
12,1 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R17 96H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4596 mmLength4295 mm
1850 mmWidth1770 mm
1761 mmHeight1615 mm
—Weight1520 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Opel Antara and 2012 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…