DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2012 Opel Antara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeOpel
ASXModelAntara
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
190 km/hTop speed186 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
147 HPPower167 HP
360 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption12,1 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/60 R17 96HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4596 mm
1770 mmWidth1850 mm
1615 mmHeight1761 mm
1520 KgWeight—
2670 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2012 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…