DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Opel Antara vs 2011 Great Wall Deer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeGreat Wall
AntaraModelDeer
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h—
186 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
167 HPPower105 HP
230 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,1 ltUrban consumption—
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption14 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4596 mmLength4870 mm
1850 mmWidth1750 mm
1761 mmHeight1800 mm
—Weight1575 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Opel Antara and 2011 Great Wall Deer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…