E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Antara vs 2016 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

72.75–73.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda CX-5
OpelMakeMazda
AntaraModelCX-5
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda CX-5
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2231 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
163 HPPower160 HP
350 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda CX-5
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank58 lt
10,0 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda CX-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—TransmissionAT
—Tyre size19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda CX-5
4596 mmLength4555 mm
1850 mmWidth1840 mm
1717 mmHeight1670 mm
1967 KgWeight1460 kg
—Luggage capacity503 lt
2707 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Opel Antara

No additional feature records are available.

Mazda CX-5Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsSunroofUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Antara and 2016 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2016 Mazda 6VS2016 Opel AntaraMazda 6 vs Opel Antara2016 and 2016 model years2016 Chevrolet CaptivaVS2016 Opel AntaraChevrolet Captiva vs Opel Antara2016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVS2016 Opel AntaraMazda CX-5 vs Opel Antara2016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVS2016 Opel AntaraSsangYong Rexton vs Opel Antara2016 and 2016 model years2016 Jeep CherokeeVS2016 Opel AntaraJeep Cherokee vs Opel Antara2016 and 2016 model years

Comments are loading…