DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Antara vs 2016 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeFord
AntaraModelRanger
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2231 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
163 HPPower130 HP
350 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,0 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4596 mmLength5277-5354 mm
1850 mmWidth1860 mm
1717 mmHeight1815 mm
1967 KgWeight1883 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Antara and 2016 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…