DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Mirage vs 2016 Opel Adam Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Mirage

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeOpel
MirageModelAdam
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,9 s
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1193 ccEngine displacement1229 cc
74 HPPower70 HP
100 NmTorque115 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank35 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
165/65 R14Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3780 mmLength3698 mm
1666 mmWidth1720 mm
1501 mmHeight1484 mm
895-905 KgWeight1026 kg
—Luggage capacity170 lt
2450 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Opel AdamDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningAlloy WheelsUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Mirage and 2016 Opel Adam approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Mirage leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…