DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Adam vs 2016 Perodua Bezza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Bezza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakePerodua
AdamModelBezza
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1229 ccEngine displacement998 cc
70 HPPower68 HP
115 NmTorque91 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank36 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3698 mmLength4150 mm
1720 mmWidth1620 mm
1484 mmHeight1510 mm
1026 kgWeight865 Kg
170 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2455 mm

Additional Features

Opel AdamDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningAlloy WheelsUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Adam and 2016 Perodua Bezza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Bezza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…