DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Adam vs 2016 Mitsubishi Mirage Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Mirage

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMitsubishi
AdamModelMirage
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1229 ccEngine displacement1193 cc
70 HPPower74 HP
115 NmTorque100 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank35 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3698 mmLength3780 mm
1720 mmWidth1666 mm
1484 mmHeight1501 mm
1026 kgWeight895-905 Kg
170 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2450 mm

Additional Features

Opel AdamDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningAlloy WheelsUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Adam and 2016 Mitsubishi Mirage approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Mirage leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…