DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1990 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeFord
CutlassModelTaurus
1989Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
3340 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
162 HPPower142 HP
0 NmTorque292 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption17 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
—Tyre size205/70 R14

Dimensions

—Length4785 mm
—Width1793 mm
—Height1379 mm
—Weight1400 Kg
—Wheelbase2692 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1990 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…