1989 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.8 V6 (142 Hp) 1989Overall Score59.25/100
1989 Ford Taurus vs 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1989 • Oldsmobile
Cutlass
Oldsmobile Cutlass 3.3 V6 (162 Hp) 1989Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Ford Taurus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
FordMakeOldsmobile
TaurusModelCutlass
1989Model year1989
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors2
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
9,0 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3340 cc
142 HPPower162 HP
292 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank60 lt
17 ltUrban consumption—
11 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/70 R14Tyre size—
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4785 mmLength—
1793 mmWidth—
1379 mmHeight—
1400 KgWeight—
2692 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1989 Ford Taurus and 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
Comments are loading…