DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1984 Audi 90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeAudi
CutlassModel90
1984Model year1984
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
180 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2471 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
106 HPPower113 HP
183 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank68 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/75 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4465 mm
1700 mmWidth1682 mm
1330 mmHeight1365 mm
1185 KgWeight1060 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2538 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1984 Audi 90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…