1984 • Audi
90
Audi 90 2.0 (113 Hp) 1984Overall Score61.25/100
1984 Audi 90 vs 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1984 • Oldsmobile
Cutlass
Oldsmobile Cutlass 2.5 i (106 Hp) 1984Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Oldsmobile Cutlass
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 90SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
AudiMakeOldsmobile
90ModelCutlass
1984Model year1984
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 90SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2471 cc
113 HPPower106 HP
165 NmTorque183 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 90SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 90SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/75 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 90SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4465 mmLength4555 mm
1682 mmWidth1700 mm
1365 mmHeight1330 mm
1060 KgWeight1185 Kg
2538 mmWheelbase2625 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1984 Audi 90 and 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…