DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1996 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeAudi
CutlassModelA6
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,6 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2190 ccEngine displacement2309 cc
122 HPPower133 HP
176 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
185/75 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4834 mmLength4797 mm
1766 mmWidth1783 mm
1375 mmHeight1440 mm
1334 KgWeight1440 Kg
2664 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1996 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…