DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi A6 vs 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeOldsmobile
A6ModelCutlass
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2309 ccEngine displacement2190 cc
133 HPPower122 HP
186 NmTorque176 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank63 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
195/65 R15Tyre size185/75 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4797 mmLength4834 mm
1783 mmWidth1766 mm
1440 mmHeight1375 mm
1440 KgWeight1334 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2664 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi A6 and 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…