DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Oldsmobile Aurora vs 2002 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeChrysler
AuroraModelConcorde
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
200 km/hTop speed192 km/h
3473 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
218 HPPower237 HP
312 NmTorque327 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5060 mmLength5310 mm
1850 mmWidth1890 mm
1440 mmHeight1417 mm
1645 KgWeight1652 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Oldsmobile Aurora and 2002 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…