DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chrysler Concorde vs 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeOldsmobile
ConcordeModelAurora
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats4
4Doors4

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
192 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3518 ccEngine displacement3473 cc
237 HPPower218 HP
327 NmTorque312 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
—Average consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength5060 mm
1890 mmWidth1850 mm
1417 mmHeight1440 mm
1652 KgWeight1645 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chrysler Concorde and 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…