DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan X-Trail vs 2003 Mazda B-series Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMazda
X-TrailModelB-series
2003Model year2003
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
191 km/hTop speed130 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
165 HPPower109 HP
230 NmTorque266 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4455 mmLength5020 mm
1765 mmWidth1695 mm
1675 mmHeight1740 mm
1470 KgWeight1205 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan X-Trail and 2003 Mazda B-series approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…