DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo XC70 vs 2003 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeNissan
XC70ModelX-Trail
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
195 km/hTop speed191 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
163 HPPower165 HP
340 NmTorque230 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4733 mmLength4455 mm
1860 mmWidth1765 mm
1562 mmHeight1675 mm
1695 KgWeight1470 Kg
2763 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo XC70 and 2003 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…