DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan X-Trail vs 2003 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
X-TrailModelRanger
2003Model year2003
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
191 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
165 HPPower109 HP
230 NmTorque266 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4455 mmLength5020 mm
1765 mmWidth1695 mm
1675 mmHeight1750 mm
1470 KgWeight1399 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan X-Trail and 2003 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…